The Magic Fish is a graphic novel by Trung Le Nguyen about a Vietnamese boy named Tiến and his relationship with his family, particularly his mother. The story intertwines the struggles of Tiến as a queer child and his mother's desire to learn English. The narrative is set in both present-day America and the fantasy world of fairy tales and folklore that Tiến escapes to while reading. The Magic Fish explores themes of identity, language, and the power of storytelling. Tiến's identity as a queer person is depicted through his inner thoughts, fears, and struggles with accepting himself. Through his interactions with his mother, Tiến learns about the power of language and communication, as his mother's quest to learn English becomes a metaphor for their efforts to understand and support each other.
Eight years later, in the Michigan Quarterly Review of 1952, Albert H. Marckwardt presented another theory for the "wolverine" name. Marckwardt's reasoning is based on the fact that Michigan was first settled by the French in the late 1700s. The appetites of the French were judged to be gluttonous or "wolverine-like" and, therefore, the nickname wolverines was conferred upon them.
Over the years a number of individuals and groups have proposed mascots in a variety of wolverine costumes but the department has refused to sanction them. It s a cool feat and there s only three of us right now that have said that we could do it and this is her time to shine and we re so proud of her, Bormes said.
Through his interactions with his mother, Tiến learns about the power of language and communication, as his mother's quest to learn English becomes a metaphor for their efforts to understand and support each other. The graphic novel incorporates a variety of fairy tales, including The Little Mermaid, Cinderella, and Beauty and the Beast, which play a crucial role in the narrative. The fairy tales serve as a way for Tiến to escape and find solace in stories that reflect his own struggles.
Michjgan state macot name
Michigan does not have a live mascot comparable to Ohio's Brutus Buckeye. The Athletic Department has steadfastly maintained that such a symbol is unnecessary and undignified and would not properly reflect the spirit and values of Michigan athletics. Over the years a number of individuals and groups have proposed mascots in a variety of wolverine costumes but the department has refused to sanction them. Instead, it continues to rely on the wolverine itself as the symbol of Michigan sports.
As early as 1861, the students and alumni began referring to themselves as "Wolverines." How the ferocious animal came be associated with the state and adopted as the university mascot remains a bit of a mystery, but there are several theories.
The simplest reason for the wolverine nickname would be that the animal was abundant in Michigan at some time. However, all the evidence points otherwise, as there has never been a verified trapping of a wolverine inside the state's borders, nor have the skeletal remains of a wolverine been found within the state's 96,705 square miles. The first verified sighting of a wild wolverine inside the state of Michigan ocurred in February of 2004.
The great Michigan football coach Fielding H. Yost had a theory for the nickname, which he wrote about in the Michigan Quarterly Review in 1944. Yost felt that the reason for the nickname concerned the trading of wolverine pelts which occurred at Sault Ste. Marie for many years. The trading station served as an exchange between the Indians, other trappers and fur traders, who would eventually ship the products off to the Eastern United States. Because many of the furs were in fact wolverine pelts, the traders may have referred to them as "Michigan wolverines," leading to the state nickname and ultimately to the University of Michigan symbol.
Eight years later, in the Michigan Quarterly Review of 1952, Albert H. Marckwardt presented another theory for the "wolverine" name. Marckwardt's reasoning is based on the fact that Michigan was first settled by the French in the late 1700s. The appetites of the French were judged to be gluttonous or "wolverine-like" and, therefore, the nickname wolverines was conferred upon them.
The last theory derives from the border dispute between Michigan and Ohio in 1803, often referred to as the "Toledo War." While the two sides argued over the proper setting of the state line, Michiganders were called wolverines. It is unclear, however, whether the Michigan natives pinned this name upon themselves to show their tenacity and strength, or whether Ohioans chose the name in reference to the gluttonous, aggressive, habits of the wolverine. From then on, Michigan was labeled the "Wolverine state" and when the University of Michigan was founded, it simply adopted the nickname of the state it represented.
Fielding Yost set out to find a wolverine in 1923, after seeing Wisconsin carry live badgers along with its football team. Yost's desire met with difficulty, as the coach had problems finding a dealer of live wolverines. After a letter to 68 trappers yielded no mascot for his team, Yost expanded his wish to any wolverine, alive or dead.
Yost was finally able to obtain a mounted wolverine from the Hudson's Bay Fur Company in the fall of 1924, but his quest for a live one continued. In 1927, 10 wolverines were obtained from Alaska and placed in the Detroit Zoo. On big football days, two of these wolverines were brought into Michigan Stadium and carried around in cages.
However, the animals grew larger and more ferocious, and as Yost stated, "It was obvious that the Michigan mascots had designs on the Michigan men toting them, and those designs were by no means friendly." Therefore, the practice of bringing wolverines into the stadium had to be discontinued after only one year. However, one of the wolverines was not returned to the Detroit Zoo. Instead, "Biff" was put in a cage at the University of Michigan Zoo where students were able to visit him at all times. It is not known how long Biff survived or remained at the campus zoo, but by the the late 1930s Yost was in search of a new wolverine mascot.
In 1939, the Chevrolet Motor Company donated a wolverine (as well as the cage to keep it in) to the University of Michigan. The as yet unnamed mascot arrived on campus in time for the season opener against Michigan State. It was apparently his one and only appearance in Michigan Stadium. The Michigan Daily later reported the campus zoo agreed to house the new mascot on the condition he not be taken out to any more football games. "The excitement, musuem officials thought, would be too much for the animal."
Chevrolet sponspred a contest to name the new mascot, with a new car for the winning entry and portable radios for ten runners-up. Some 7,00 entries were submitted along with a 20-word or less rationale for the prosed name. A committee made up of Prof William Burt, instructor in zoology and curator of mammals at the Museum of Zoology; fresham football coach Wally Weber, football manager Carl Wheeler; Fielding Yost, Athletic Director; and Ben Fineberg, sports editor of the Daily -- would select a winner based on "originality, unnusualness, and aptness."
Intrepidus won LSA junior Donald Rivette a new Chevorlet.
Rivette told the Daily reporter he had scanned the dictionary for inspiration and intrepid (fearless, undaunted, unshaken) caught his eye. The Latin form, he thought, "embodied the ferocity, the fighting spirit of the animal and Michigan's athletic teams."
Intrepidus ("Treppy" as he was affectionately known--if one can be affectionate towards a wolverine) surived at the campus zoo until 1948. Three years later the Daily the Zoology Museum was trying to find a new wolverine.
Copyright ©2002 The Regents of the University of Michigan
Last updated, May 2007
Page created by Greg Kinney, Bentley Historical Library Comments or questions to webmaster
Through the years, Sparty has won the hearts of not only Spartans, but admirers around the globe. In 2015, Sparty was immortalized as a bronze monument inside the MSU Union. Now a destination and perfect photo-op, the sculpture became the second “Bronze Sparty” on campus, following the original “The Spartan” statue’s bronze replica created 10 years prior. Photo by Derrick L. Turner.
They also provide a platform for him to express his true self and affirm his identity. The artwork in The Magic Fish is stunning and evocative, incorporating vibrant colors and intricate details to bring the story to life. The use of different visual styles for present-day scenes and fairy tale sequences helps to differentiate between reality and fantasy, creating a visually stunning experience for the reader. Overall, The Magic Fish is a touching and beautifully rendered graphic novel that explores important themes of identity, language, and storytelling. Through the eyes of Tiến, readers are invited to reflect on their own experiences and the power of personal narratives..
Reviews for "The Journey of Self-Discovery in Trung Le Nguyen's 'The Magic Fish"
1. John Doe - 2/5 - I didn't enjoy "The Magic Fish" by Trung Le Nguyen as much as I had hoped. While the artwork was beautiful and the story had potential, I found the execution lacking. The dialogue felt forced and cliché, and the pacing was inconsistent. Additionally, the characters were one-dimensional and lacked depth, making it difficult for me to connect with them on an emotional level. Overall, I was disappointed by this graphic novel and wouldn't recommend it to others.
2. Jane Smith - 1/5 - I found "The Magic Fish" by Trung Le Nguyen to be incredibly boring and unoriginal. The plot was predictable and there were no surprises along the way. The artwork, while visually appealing, couldn't make up for the lackluster story. I also felt that the characters were poorly developed and didn't engage me in any way. Overall, I regret wasting my time with this graphic novel and would advise others to skip it.
3. Robert Johnson - 2/5 - I had high expectations for "The Magic Fish" by Trung Le Nguyen, but unfortunately, it fell flat for me. The story felt disjointed and confusing, with multiple subplots that didn't seem to connect in a meaningful way. The artwork was impressive, but it couldn't make up for the lack of a cohesive narrative. Additionally, the dialogue felt stilted and unrealistic, making it difficult for me to become invested in the characters' struggles. Overall, I was left feeling unsatisfied and wouldn't recommend this graphic novel to others.